• cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    “I’m making a comic about stereotypical man, but I don’t know any man”

    Must be a good read.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      In this case it’s funny…if the person asking that were a white straight guy asking about any other group, folks would be getting out their pitchforks.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m so baffled that most people reading this don’t get its satire of a lot of comics, sci-fi, video games, etc but with the genders reversed and people thinking it’s a reasonable position.

      The author isn’t being literal, they are making a joke about men who unironically say this and expect it to be considered normal.

      Please don’t yell at me for this I am just the messenger.

      • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s because there is good satire, and pretty often rubbish niche satire. Satire usually relies on everyone being in on the joke, accepting the ludicrousness of it. Political satire is good at this, gender stereotype satire is pretty deep psychologically layered stuff. Most people are not psychologically trained, or even people watchers. So the satire gets missed.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          To me, trying to be dispassionate here, that’s also an issue with capping tweets.

          In a social media feed such as (pre-Elon) Twitter, if one were the depicted author one would expect ones followers to know you are a successful illustrator, political essayist, social commentator and published author on the topics of sexual violence in culture and an NEA fellow off the back of your successful graphic novel, putting the context of the original tweet in perspective and making the satire very obvious.

          To be a little less dispassionate and a little more arch: isn’t the burden of that on the reader, not the author?

          • Misconduct@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Man no get satire so satire bad! Man over analyze reason instead of just accepting it not for man and moving on! Grunting noises or something!

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              As a man, I feel personally attacked and it’s glorious. Most of the arguments between my wife and I are me over analyzing things.

              I hope the author (if they’re actually writing something) goes hard on that concept.

          • The_Tired_Horizon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            To be a little less dispassionate and a little more arch: isn’t the burden of that on the reader, not the author?

            Yes and no.

            We have limited cognitive abilities as humans. With every bit of information on social and regular media screaming for our attention its easy to miss the nuance. Add to that even the difference in culture in countries side by side there can be barriers to this absorption generated by our various cultures. You have to actively break from cultural norms to explore these other ideas and philosophies.

            Might well be a little too deep for “I dont know any men” type memes… 😅

            • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              A fair point but also, if one wants to say “hey they didn’t give context to their joke, when the poster deliberately removed it from its contextual home!”, there’s nothing that can stop them, but also, they shouldn’t be surprised to find people asking them to understand the context before complaining about the lack of it.

              Consider something like “I didn’t know Stevie Wonder was blind, and it’s therefore not my fault that I didn’t get the joke about Stevie Wonder being blind.”

              Like, sure, maybe it’s not, but also, it would hamper any joke if you had to explain all context.

              A rabbi, a priest, and an Iman walk into a bar (a rabbi is a spiritual leader and officiant in the Jewish faith, Judaism is a monotheistic religion, a religion is a set of beliefs that characterize a worldview including but not limited to spirituality, ethics, morals, social conduct and worship of divine beings…)

            • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Here’s a reward: 🎖️

              You have the first correct use of “nuance” I’ve seen/heard in the last 50 uses of the word.

              No, I’m not being sarcastic. I mean it.

              My comment is a tangent and is not directly related to the ongoing discussion.

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      Very religious single mother with lots of money from a divorce has a daughter, sends her to a girls-only boarding school, she studies theology and joins a convent, becomes a nun - now you have a thirty-something year old woman who has never known a man on a personal conversational basis (may have seen/heard them in passing, possibly a teacher or church leader as well).

      (This is most likely not the case and purely exists as a ridiculous but possible answer to your question.)

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    When I was a kid, my town had a bowling ball factory where they would leave the rejected balls in a big pile in back of the building, unguarded. In winter, we would sometimes nick a few and walk to one of the bridges on the local river which had iced over and drop the balls in. Dropping little rocks into water is cool and all, but absolutely nothing compares to the satisfying explosion from one of those bowling balls on ice.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, this was the late '70s when all kinds of crazy shit was going on that’s unheard of today. As another example, retail stores used to just leave handheld electronic games out on the sales counters where amoral young boys could easily slip them into their paper bags and stroll out the door with them and then tell their parents they’d “found them in the garbage”. Not that I would know anything about that kind of thing …

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    If there is a fire it must be bothered. It must be prodded several times and sticks need adding to it. The fire cannot be trusted not take care of itself.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Hitting something with a ranged attack. Doesn’t matter the target, doesn’t matter the projectile. Basketball at hoop, dart at dart board, pee at poo stain, bb gun at empty can, snowball at tree, bullet at bullseye, it’s all the same to us

  • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Successfully unsticking your balls from an uncomfortable position in public with only minor leg motions

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why do men always want to hog all these enjoyable past-times? Next they’ll be claiming that stuff like stepping on frozen puddles on the side of the road to hear the satisfying cracking noises is a “guy thing”. Like please, we all know men don’t go outside.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        But when I do, I throw large rocks into bodies of water from great heights. It’s one of those instinctual things I just can’t control, but it only happens when I go outside.

    • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      i think a lot of “guy things” are just people things but guys are like “omg thats totally me and not anyone else”

      having said that, its definitely a guy thing to claim things as guy things.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I remember grocery shopping as a kid filling the cart completely full and when we went through the register it was over $100 and my mom was going jeez that’s a lot of money for a lot of food. It took 3 people several trips to unload the car.

      Today I go through the self checkout, get a few frozen meals, some store brand cookies, and a case of cheap beer for $80. I can carry the two bags and beer with one hand.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Just a note here, I bet your mom wasn’t buying “dinners,” she was buying “ingredients.” Ingredients take up a lot more space in the cart per dollar spent. Sometimes that’s because you pay a premium for prepared foods, (flour vs cookies) and sometimes it’s because there’s inherent waste, like onion skins, and both ends of that head of celery, and the bones of the whole chicken, and the stem, seeds, and vacant space inside a bell pepper. Also, not judging the beer, but in my childhood Dad bought all the alcoholic beverages from the liquor store in a separate trip. So it wouldn’t have been in the grocery bags, nor on that receipt.

        Inflation is real. But it’s important to:

        A. Make accurate comparisons

        B. Value the work that went into turning those ingredients into dinners.

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve been going to Costco every week for several years. Pre Covid my big trips were around $350. Yesterday I went and got some beer, wine, and some beef jerky and it came out to $350

        My big cart days are a lot closer to $700 too now. Certain items I remember being $10 are now $16-18. It’s insane.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re raising the prices because we’re buying “frozen meals, cookies, and beer”. All of that can be made at home for cheaper. Well, the beer and cookies may cost the same but they will be twice as good.

        Figure out what is your biggest purchase and find the recipe for it. Pasta, Indian food, cookies, and even beer can be made at home if you know what you’re doing.

        Prices were lower before because everyone knew they could probably whip up something similar. If you have a bag of flour, some butter, and some sugar you can basically make half of the things at the grocery store.