Wouldn’t it be great if you didn’t have to vote for the least horrible candidate? If you could vote for who you wanted without feeling like you’re throwing your vote away?

If we had ranked choice voting, we’d have better legislators in office to start with. And if they used it in the speaker votes this could be resolved already.

  • Zoolander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    That doesn’t make sense. They don’t even have consensus right now within their party to vote in a FPTP system. You think they’d be able to coalesce around multiple people, in the same order?

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The whole point of RCV is that internally it is equivalent of running multiple runoff elections, each time eliminating the lowest performer.

      Republicans right now can run as many speaker elections as they want.

      If they had a goal to conclude it then Gym Jordan would get more votes in every run.