In other news: The leopard population has exploded due to a near unlimited supply of faces.
Surely te leopard won’t eat MY face.
Your MAGATS Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should
Ron Johnson and Pete Sessions
Let the ketchup hit the wall, Let the ketchup hit the wall….
Unlike in the case of President, the 14th amendment can be used against State and local officials without an act of Congress. This protects against insurrectionists on the State and local level.
I guess in this instance they were had 787 million items on their mind.
Well…damn! It’s not a final decision, and must keep going through lower courts.(Note: haven’t read the decision yet, though)
This.
If he didn’t know a certain segment was excitable to violence due to his speech when he was first elected, he certainly knows now. Yet, he continues with similar and even increasingly frequent and questionable speech.
Daily Beast changed their headline. The link contains the original title https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-declares-it-will-be-a-bloodbath-for-america-if-hes-not-elected archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20240316225241/https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-declares-it-will-be-a-bloodbath-for-america-if-hes-not-elected
The Twister world champion
The host of “Fox News Sunday,” Shannon Bream, asked Britt if she meant to “give the impression that this horrible story happened on President Biden’s watch.” Britt replied “no” before defensively explaining that she was speaking about the executive actions on the border that Biden took in his first 100 days as president.
This places it under Trump or earlier in any event.
2004 is earlier, no?
Sean Ross, Britt’s communications director, confirmed that she was talking about Karla Jacinto Romero — who has testified before Congress about being forced to work in Mexican brothels from 2004 to 2008.
(A viral TikTok by journalist Jonathan Katz first revealed that Britt was speaking about Romero.) In a phone conversation and a statement, Ross disputed that Britt’s language was misleading.
We disagree. Let’s take a look.
Well, if the poor woman who suffered the horrible abuse starting at the age of 12, it had to have been at least 6 years ago (assuming she is an 18 y/o adult now). This places it under Trump or earlier in any event.
It gets good reviews on the sites I use to check for credibility and bias (MBFC, NewsGuard, Ad Fontes). Hopefully it can maintain this, but as it is new, will have to keep a more frequent eye on it.
He’s Schrödinger’s Brandon: Too strong and too weak at the same time. I wonder if there is an ideology that typically uses this tactic to define an opponent?