po-lina-ergi

For anybody who doesn’t understand the argument, it’s specifically a rebuttal to the idea that “The second amendment only applies to muzzle loaded muskets because nothing more advanced existed at the time”

“Free speech only applies to newspapers and soapboxes because nothing more advanced existed at the time”

“oh no, don’t”, whispers biden from the sidelines

Super weird that when you commit a genocide against a people and then colonise their land they aren’t thrilled about it.

Did you just link to a source that said both sides broke it and act like it said only one broke it?