Shark Party!

Please don’t eat in your lab. That’s how you get contamination poisoning

I think you got it backwards, I mean the new one doesn’t have cohesion: the parallel stories don’t really match with each other

Nope, as I generally want to be entertained when I spend money and time for a movie.
I’d lie if I said I expected this to be as good as the first one, but boy was that an understatement…

In one or two simlpe sentences, summarize the story of the original Beetlejuice film.

Ghost couple tries to shoo away the family who bought their house after they died. The thing gets out of hand when they hire Beetlejuice.

Why this question, tho?

I really hope that you’re not gonna end up disappointed as I was yesterday coming out of the theater: I could’t find one single aspect I enjoyed and still cannot

Story cohesion, justifiable plot, relatable characters, believable dialogues, good montage (there are more frame changes than a fast and furious chase sequence) and in general there is nothing that make this one look like a Tim Burton movie.
But hey we now have *checks notes* Monica Bellucci, the worst actress the big screen has ever seen…

I saw it last night: it’s the worst wet fart of a movie I’ve seen in a long time

They quoted the word “pureed” which means there was butter and potato starch involved

In the end it’s the humidity that gets you

Cormorants are rage fueled savages

That’s a fine choice sir/ma’am.

My close second, story wise, would be Link’s Awakening. The story was a real mind fuck when I was a kid.

If you consider emulating older games a viable option, I would suggest:

• Chrono Trigger (SNES)
• Silent Hill (PS1)
• Any Legend of Zelda game (Majora’s Mask is my favourite story-wise)

In fact I don’t know, the only thing that I do know is expecting that every other human is going to have your same sensibility is a recipe for frustration.
I lerned that the hard way

Yeah but that’s a real longshot

The fact that your mind went immediately there is a little worrying… Is everything alright?
And I’m not shaming you or being sarcastic, just talk with someone if what I’m saying is true

So you are able to understand the specific content of a generic comment!
Good for you pal! Now go and read my first comment once again because I can tell that you still didn’t understand the point I was trying to make back then.

That plus the fact that everyone entered this thread with an opinion that is limited to one aspect of the matter, which is fine by the way until you try to derail the conversation towards that specific opinion so that you can pull it out totally out of context like a priest’s cock

It’s always going to be unfair when the game is going to be “how strong am I?” because it will always boil down to genetics. If your body is more suited than mine to shoot punches you are going to win, regardless of sex, gender, ethnicity or age: basically the Olympics are a “Biggest Pumpkin Competition” but with a better advertising campaign.

So all of this rhetoric of “should we test athletes for testosterone” is fucking dumb on both sides.
Give them fucking chainsaws and let them massacre each other for my entertainment.

Yeah I’m sorry, sometimes in sake of brevity you skip some premises thinking an average minded person would be able to put it together on their own