• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle



  • Not the strongest because Steam Machines with Alienware had problems and way too early during development of Proton that games couldn’t handle well. The controller was stolen IP and is still currently fighting the lawsuit. VR games are not great as people expected and rarely do new VR games arrived. Leaving the VR headset in storage for mostly the owners life. Lastly, the Steam Deck original has problems and announced updates or free ifix fixes just to not have drifting problems. Still the Steam Deck after the original has some issues with compatibility and deleting their data every update.

    The company has poor track records for hardware. Valve is like the Sony of gaming, they lie about stuff and make you sign up to download the game in their closed ecosystem.





  • firecat@kbin.socialtoGames@sh.itjust.worksSteam keeps on winning
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s way worse because it’s not EULA, it’s the Steam User Agreement contract. The same contract that says if you agree, you can not sue Valve corporation. The same contract that decides to sell your data to 3rd parties. The same contract for locking your account in any reason or time.

    EULA protects games from being sold on shady websites and the developers. Steam User Agreement doesn’t protect anyone against Valve Corporation.


  • firecat@kbin.socialtoGames@sh.itjust.worksSteam keeps on winning
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ubisoft has proven itself to remove games from the market and become unplayable. You also legally agree in the Steam User Agreement that all games in Steam don’t belong to you. This isn’t a legal copyrighted material but the concept of ownership of the game at all in Steam is legally prohibited to own.


  • firecat@kbin.socialtoScience Memes@mander.xyzMe too
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even if they have references, the website might no longer exist or they reference into another document that tells it in a book which you need to know the title to find such book and read the book but that one told you the reference is from a foreign forktale and books of that very cliche story aren’t included on popular literature. That’s when you ask lots of people who have knowledge of said topic to help continue your research. After like hundreds of books you discover a scroll detailing the history of the reference in ok kinda way but leave everything up to you. Afterwards when you got all the information in s neatly styled modern day understanding for Wikiapedia, it gets rejected and you just decide to sent it to someone or keep it until wikipedia stops being a jerk about their rules for newer versions.










  • The source clearly outlined that people will stay within their community because they believe in their choice. Yet, Kurzgesagt makes no mention of it. The other source is from news papers mentioning social media platforms and impact on people. Looking into the research tells you everything else. The data was collected in certain areas but should not be used as evidence for all of the internet. Things like video, music and outside activities take time and just claiming to only look at past twitter or only older people of Facebook isn’t going to get enough context in internet problems. Kurzgesagt Will never mention the research because the research is saying they want more data.