• 1 Post
  • 28 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 8th, 2024

help-circle





  • Are you sure about that? If there are things I know about the solar system, it’s that the distance between planets is massive and earth weighs nothing compared to the outer planets or the sun.

    That earth like rogue planet needs to be like 1/500th of the distance to the sun to have an comparable gravitational pull (sun is 333000 heavier, sqrt is 577), and I’m not a astronomer but I believe for each planet a random number between 0 and 2 solar distances that the rogue planet passes the orbit is appropriate. So like, 1/1000 chance a planet gets seriously disturbed…

    I’m gonna be honest I thought this would be way lower before I calculated.


  • And other cops aren’t.

    We have here, from this case alone:

    • 1 absolutely insane individual who recklessly killed Jaahnavi Kandula, Kevin Dave.
    • Daniel Auderer, who laughed at her death and said she was lower value anyway
    • Mike Solan, who didn’t shut Daniel down the moment he said that, also coincidentally SPOG president
    • Whomever is authorized to discharge all 3 of these
    • Whomever gave any of these 3 their positions
    • The Union that defends these guys
    • The cops willingly giving money to that Union

    We have more of such cases than Police Unions.


  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzStatistics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Who here plans on driving their car today? Show of hands!” … “I recommend getting to know these people, because you are far more likely to die in an car accident caused by a stranger than by someone you know. But also don’t upset them, as you are far more likely to be murdered by someone you know rather than a stranger.”

    “Mr Tourguide, aren’t you supposed to talk about sharks?”


  • It does say that, but she probably does have the usual XX.

    The IBA based their decision to exclude her on 2 tests one in 22 and one in 23, never officially said which tests they were to protect their participants privacy, and then the president of the IBA just said they were chromosome tests.

    If it was a chromosome test, they would have disqualified her in 22, those don’t change in a year. Hell, they would have disqualified her in 2023 before she entered the semi finales.

    It seems more likely that she was fine in both tests. I say that because the Olympic people aren’t fools, if her Chromosomes were a problem, they wouldn’t have allowed her to participate.

    Now, why don’t the Olympics just trust the IBA? High corruption made them remove the IBA’s Olympic status. If you then look at who Khelif beat in 2023 before her disqualification, you might then be Russian a conclusion.




  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.worldtoaww@lemmy.worldRule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I couldn’t find estimates for snakes and scorpions and completely ignored the invertebrates here, but from those options, Tigers kill the most humans yearly per wild individual.

    There are about 5500 Tigers in the wild killing 50 humans yearly, while 115000 Hippos kill 500 humans yearly.

    So Tigers kill 9 humans per thousand individuals, Hippos kill 4, next would be Lions with 2.5 .

    Maybe they are the more deadly than Tigers on a per species basis since there are only 2 species of Hippo while 6 living species of Tigers exist… but then the other kill statistics would get a lot more precise as well. And I wont even try to analyze how often humans interact with specific animal groups.




  • I never said that. What I meant is that a behaviour, which benefits a species as a whole but reduces one individual’s fitness, is not evolutionary competitive. It’s evolutionary game theory, like the prisoners dilemma from normal game theory.

    And to determine if some behaviour is such a dilemma, you have to consider costs and benefits of it, which is not at all clear in natural situations. That’s why I said it needs to be studied.

    But I must concede, I sort of assumed what exactly you called an evolutionary advantage. Common homosexuality in penguins or not discriminating against homosexual individuals in penguins have very different analysis here.


  • Tudsamfa@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPenguins ❤️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d be cautious with saying evolutionary advantage here.

    I don’t believe the “Gay Uncle hypothesis” any more than the somewhat debunked “Grandmother Hypothesis”, which aimed to explain menopause with biological altruism. Just because we could think of a way in that it might be advantageous for a species doesn’t mean it’s advantageous for an individuals fitness.

    Of course, it can be still an advantage, but we’d only know with more free, uncensored research.