He’s got a concept of a letter.

“but I saw it on TV!” is the most geriatric and concerning defense trump could have offered

Best: Twix

Worst: peanut butter kisses

The economy must transition from fossil fuels to other forms of energy. The longer we take the worse it will be, but nobody in power feels any urgency.

Add to that the GFC of 2008 that we “fixed” by printing money, and which was followed by a global pandemic and financial slowdown that… we fixed by printing money.

Now factor in the fact that we didn’t use 2008 to tighten banking regulation, and we have just as many opaque financial instruments (derivatives, swaps) as we did back then.

And all of this as global warming kicks into absolute overdrive, likely due to a feed forward mechanism being tripped such as the methane release from Siberia and/or the clathrate gun going off.

We are well and truly fucked. This reality is noticable if you’re paying attention, and will slowly become impossible to miss (let alone ignore).

Let’s follow up on this in 12 months.

I suspect it will be worse. Much worse.

“Where are your parents?” the man asked the little girl, as he cut off the direction she was walking

I don’t want that to be a narrative that any person can ever tell about me. It could be a totally innocent act, but a sinister framing is easy to assume and impossible to refute.

Hard pass.

Yeah, it’s totally reasonable. But I’m the current climate I’m not blocking any person’s kid unless they’re going in front of an oncoming train.

I am more likely to get in their way and ask them where their parents are.

I was with you until that last sentence.

Agreed

But you can’t have privacy without security, and any privacy brand must have security in their bones.

It is a super important detail, but it’s still unforgivable for an app that expects privacy to be part of its brand identity.

Because nobody expected him to do anything but lie through his teeth and shit his pants.

Check and check.

Because if Trump dies then we have a lot less to worry about

What do you look for?

Bones prove you existed.

But the absence of bones does not mean that you didn’t.

Short answer: no

Longer answer: if it were that simple, then money laundering would not be a billion dollar industry.

I think you are right, but I also think that “based on” is accurate for a sufficiently broad definition of that term.

Who wants this?

If you are a creative freelancer and have any confidentiality agreement with your clients, then it is now impossible to use Adobe without violating those agreements.

And there is massive liability if you mess it up.

Fake dentist

Can this replace the need for a seed box?