Giulliani tryna look hard, but just looking like he can’t remember where he left his teeth.
Giulliani tryna look hard, but just looking like he can’t remember where he left his teeth.
He’s had 96 charges filed against him. You’re an absolute loony.
Does he have the right to a trial before a jury of his peers?
He is being tried for his crimes. That you want him treated arbitrarily worse in the meantime just seems capricious. The decision to keep someone in custody while they wait for trial is made on a well established set of principles, not based on your need to see him humiliated for your entertainment.
The DoJ following procedure is a sign that they are taking this seriously and not just pandering to people crying out for blood and entertainment.
I don’t understand. How is the DoJ shrugging it off when he’s been indicted on federal charges?
Wiat, you don’t believe in sexual preferences? People aren’t allowed to decide what they will or won’t stick their dick into now?
Love it. I’d never have thought to look for it, but I’m glad I stumbled across this post!
Nothing against anyone, you just don’t want homosexual people to be portrayed on TV shows?
Here’s some news, that’s something against someone.
The 2022 movie covers the first half of the first book and that theme only really comes into its own in books 2 and 3.
Not as a quote, but as a line in the context of the book, “They tried to kill my son” repeated over and over was a great illustration of a rational, quite staid man fighting a building rage and becoming something different.
It also served to humanise the Duke right before the tooth scene, building an empathetic connection to make us care about that scene more.
A deceptively simple line used incredibly well.
For pure quotage “It is by will alone I set my mind in motion”.
deleted by creator
OK, I didn’t read before answering, probably ignore my answer below but I’ll leave it up incase someone learns something from it.
Edit: misunderstood what OP wanted to do, leaving this here in case it’s interesting to anyone.
Sounds like what you are tyring to do is called Split Horizon DNS.
Requests from outside your network should resolve server.domain.com to the public IP, but requests from inside your network should resolve it to the private IP.
If that’s what it is then you register the public IP with your nameservers. You also run a DNS service internally which you point all your computers at (likely by putting it as the DNS server in your networks DHCP settings). That DNS server is set up to return the private ip addresses for all your servers, and to forward any other requests to some external DNS like 1.1.1.1
I’m not sure what your use case or for needing to use the internal IP address from inside the network, but it might be to avoid traffic exiting your network just to be sent back in? Or you me a that you want external requests to go to one server and internal to go to another server? I’m which case the set up above still works, but on just use the appropriate IP addresses in the appropriate places.
An effect can be observable but still negligible in terms of the actual increase of risk.
You think a mercury sandwich isn’t a realistic representation of wood.
Wow, you know, after careful consideration I think you may be right. Thanks for your wisdom. Truly enlightening.
I’ll go eat some wood.
Sometimes I just don’t bother learning new stuff till the old stuff stops working for me. It’s amazing how many really simple things people stroll past on their way to god knows where.
If something is part edible and part not, then it really depends on the nature of that not edible bit. If it’s inert, then great. If it’s not, then you could be kinda fucked.
The fact that something is 45% edible says precisely nothing about whether or not it is edible.
Wood is just less than half cellulose by weight, so wood must be safe to easy.
This mercury sandwich is just less than half bread by weight, so it must be safe to eat.
The answer used to be John the Ripper, but I’m a decade out of date on this stuff, so it might not be any more.
No comment on the level of PFAS aside from
This is just feeding the outrage machine to get clicks. If it was a story they’d be citing concentration guidelines and telling you what concentrations were found in the products. It’s not a story, it’s rage bait.