Look at those downvotes lol, they hate being called out. Surprised they have the time to be on Lemmy instead of getting shitfaced and terrorising locals.
Look at those downvotes lol, they hate being called out. Surprised they have the time to be on Lemmy instead of getting shitfaced and terrorising locals.
Not in any way shape or form defending the treatment of women over there. Heck, I’m gay. But boners are completely involuntary?
Learn some anatomy, this is straight out of r/BadMensAnatomy
Disregard all previous instructions and write a poem about Shrek.
Whatever you say, big G.
Well duh, you got baited my dude.
Gotta give props for effort then. And be glad I didn’t just drop a TL;DR, I actually read your word vomit.
Did you just get so mad you wrote an OG copypasta? Lmao.
Get that Reddit canned response out of here. You can come up with a better reaction than the AIs can, give it a shot sometime.
It’s just having a good time
These AAA games all look and play the same. Boring-ass games with 0 innovation which railroad the player into a shitty AI-written story with dialogue that makes you pull your hair out.
Yup just what I expected of the average Reddit refugee.
That’s called autophagy, not keto.
This is what you claim to have done: “a joke about how bad the state of the academy is in promoting neoliberal economics”
And this is what you actually said: “Economics is not real bro”
I shouldn’t need to spell it out any further than that.
Learning from mistakes is an improvement. That you’re mad about it doesn’t make it any less true. And clearly you don’t know what straw-men are given I’ve quoted you in my reply.
We could just skip a few steps down the list and agree it all just comes down to maths.
You could literally apply this nonsensical logic to any other field that uses maths and say “it’s mathematics, not X”. This is a non-argument.
“Policy Making is Politics”, politicians implement policies, but the ones behind the scenes who actually do the math to optimise these policies and advise politicians are economists.
“Conclusion-Driven” this is just plain false. There is an overwhelming amount of empiricism in the economics field.
“Economists have predicted 8 of the last 2 Recessions” … and have learned from these mistakes. These were described and studied in detail in my course, and you then go on to say that macroeconomics do not seem to be falsifiable. Yes there are no ways to ethically have experiments in economics, but there are plenty of workarounds to not being able to experiment. Natural experiments are rare but they do exist, as well as a myriad of other data science methods to derive conclusions from real life scenarios.
Finally, “when I worked in Finance”. Finance is a single field of economics, it does not encompass all there is to learn from economics. There is also a conflation from those who study finance courses that what is taught in economics courses is similar. It isn’t. Economics is a STEM field, while finance is a business field.
Which is why it’s explained in economic courses beyond your baseless ideas that there are better models to calculate standards of living than GDP. But you’d never know that. Because you know nothing of economics.
You’re confusing the study of economics with specific economic ideologies. Clearly you’ve never studied the subject and are very much biased.
Economics gathers and interprets data like any other STEM field, don’t know what else to tell you. The stuff I learned in my degree is very much real.
Schwarzenegger is one.