It reviewed itself and found no fault. Never goes wrong, don’t you know?
Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.
It reviewed itself and found no fault. Never goes wrong, don’t you know?
Well… No offense… but duh? It’s not like OP can migrate his spouses “Spouse@gmail.com” address to his mail server.
I was under the assumption (and I could be wrong) that OP owns the domain… And wants to run their mailboxes. If she wants to keep her own mailbox and use it, just forward it to her gmail if that’s what she wants. I’m also not insinuating forcing someone into something.
I own my domain(you guessed correctly) and host my own emails. My spouse does use an inbox on my server(actually a few)… If she didn’t want to anymore she can open a mailbox where-ever she wants… and I’ll even forward whatever I get to her. That’s it. Wouldn’t stop me from running my own inbox on my own server. And I’m not forcing her to do anything at all. She can use it or not.
This is the mentality I have when I made the previous comments. Just forward her stuff off, she can go wherever she wants.
Until the basement floods and the server goes offline for a few days
That’s what backups are for.
or botched upgrade that’s failing quietly;
See above
over zealous spam assassin configuration;
That’s an assumption that you’re using this specific product.
What’s funny is you think that all of this can’t happen to your stuff on Google’s servers either for some reason… Say the wrong thing in a Youtube comment? Boom whole google profile banned. All your emails are gone too.
Or random software that interfaces poorly with each other (https://support.google.com/mail/thread/142335843/all-of-my-emails-have-disappeared-how-can-i-recover-them?hl=en)
SMTP is stupidly forgiving. You’re not going to magically lose singular emails.
But one thing is for sure, my wife won’t have any of it. She’s a total backwards thinking give me windows or I’ll jump kind of Gal.
So… forward her inbox to her personal gmail account? Keep your mail server as it was for you?
My dude, have you ever been on a flight that’s only 20 minutes?
yes.
I haven’t even gone throufh an airport terminal in only 20 minutes.
Good thing I said nothing about time in the terminal and was only talking about flights.
Sounds like you’re exactly the person that needs this policy then.
Eh if it’s 20 minutes flights it might not be enough for those who magically can’t control themselves while drunk.
Just another policy that would hurt people who can actually exert some form of control over themself.
You’d need every airport to be in on the same system… otherwise you’ll end up with 2 drinks at phx, 2 drinks at atl, and 2 drinks at jfk.
But this “overall” plan was basically fictional—it was a model, and apparently not an accurate one. Georgia Tech doesn’t have a unified IT setup; it has hundreds of different IT setups, including a different one at most research labs.
Yes… this is actually common. Your typical state school is actually made up of many different colleges working in tandem with each other. The nursing “school” is different than the law “school” at your university. Often even holding completely different names internally.
Random speculation: Could be banks needing to pull out of the market due to the Fed
…
Japan stocks
I mean… it could be. But most foreign stock markets aren’t directly tethered to the Fed.
they were sent back to Africa
Right… Where Russia was attempting to sell “Russian Protection”… I could understand them being there. But there’s no ties to south America as far as I’m aware. Though admittedly, I haven’t looked to keep myself up to date there.
This helps Russia build influence which is something it desperately needs right now.
They need it even more after what’s happening in Mali… I don’t think any South American country would take to kindly to Russia at this point.
It would mean the guy who is yelling about the CIA trying to overthrow him has accepted Russian help.
Eh, I’d buy it… but my arguments weren’t a point that it’s impossible… But that the other guy couldn’t keep his head straight for 3 seconds to actually bring a cogent point. It’s just frothing at the mouth “Russia good, USA bad”, “See these politicians doing their jobs‽ Stop looking at the military assets.”
No. If it’s found out that the author of the bot has some other hangup/problem, it’s worth discussing. And almost always will be beneath the bot itself. I’ve participated in other threads discussing the bots merits and the problems with this specific bot plenty of times already. Nothing wrong with that discussion. Just the bot is garbage. Artificially raises interactions on posts with no meaningful discussion or information.
Then you miss any discussion that happens under them.
Not when that password is just an email…
sigh Still dodging the questions I see.
Venezuelan Opposition Presidential Candidate María Corina Machado
This is how you described them. They are a politician then… Yes, you would expect them to meet with and converse with other politicians.
Please explain why a possible Russian MILITARY asset would be in Venezuela. Please explain how these are the same.
Weird you failed to address why a military asset wouldn’t be participating in Russia’s current “special operations” and instead is in another country clear across the world…
But somehow you think it’s odd that politicians are meeting with politicians. Which is not only a common occurrence, but I would actually call my politicians incompetent if they didn’t do.
You realize this is a completely different ball game right? You would expect leaders to be talking to each other. You wouldn’t expect military assets somewhere that they aren’t active in.
The correct answer is that we don’t know if it’s actually Russian military. This is rumor at best. But your brain is so wired by whoever indoctrinated you to believe that Russia can’t do any bad you can’t even think straight.
Ah yes. An image of Russia halfway across the world RIGHT NOW doing stuff in a place they really can’t afford to waste resources on since they’re currently in a special military operation… Must be Bush’s fault from 20 years ago.
/s
Wow you must be a very special person if you think a US leader from 20 years ago had anything to do with Putin’s choices now.
No. Because retaliatory missiles would be fired long before the “dud” landed. I can guarantee that any missile leaving any known nuclear site would illicit a response. The only hesitation would be “where is it heading?”. After that though… it’s fair game.
Fucking wish America would stop being the worlds police.