Sure they’re not with the pumas?
Thought to have been an ordinary falling star.
Sure they’re not with the pumas?
Depends on which computer I’m using. Netscape 4 still works relatively well, as long as you’re selective about which sites you try to access.
It’s rare to come across a fellow Chicken Invaders fan
07-26, surely?
Why all three? Redundancy?
When was this, exactly?
I’m amazed there’s anyone out there who hasn’t heard of Jim Fucking Sterling, Son
I ran 7 on a Dell netbook for a few years, and it worked great (though, naturally, not as great as XP)
Because mice are a solved problem. New phones can ostensibly have new features, better cameras, better displays, etc. Similarly, new cards and CPUs can give you measurably better performance.
A new mouse is something you get when your old mouse is broken, and if that’s happening every year, then there’s a big problem.
Made by the same team as the Pro Pinball games, which is why it’s so darned good.
Off the top of my head:
The MD game you’re thinking of is likely to be Psycho Pinball.
I have to question in what world one would need “the latest mouse” every year. The only reason is if Logitech makes such a crap mouse that it starts to fall apart, thus necessitating a new one.
The only other avenue is that the mouse just gets more and more bloated with additional “features” year-on-year.
The principle isn’t the worst, but the implications are less than ideal
The CEO of a corporation should be the living embodiment of that corp. Kind of like Subway in Community
Unless you’re using a non-Chromium browser, that is.
I pay for it because I thought it was a trustworthy service that had earnt my money. Instead, if they continue with stuff like this then I’ll go back to not trusting subscription services again.
This and the new LLM “feature” in ProtonMail suggests that someone higher up has had a sniff of the techbro kool-aid.
I would probably say fast, efficient, high-performance, or optimal, depending on context. Or just “it performs well”. But I recognise I’m in the vast minority - just one of those new words that bugs me now but I’ll eventually accept
Fine, but I’m still not happy about ‘performant’
It’s an odd one. At a guess, the idea is that the build is so good / powerful that it breaks the game (or, indeed, the meta) for everyone else.