Guess who I am now perfectly with a “happy accident” happening to?
Guess who I am now perfectly with a “happy accident” happening to?
War crimes are explicitly not terrorism by definition. If you need a basic high school education though there’s hopefully a public school near you. This subject and topic is covered under civics.
Wars are by definition lawful. Sorry you’re wrong
It’s also not a twisted definition. It’s the literal dictionary definition that all countries use when defining terrorism.
And no, if war time acts were not lawful, all war is terrorism which it isn’t so again you’re wrong.
Israel can’t be called terrorism because terrorism must be—by definition—unlawful
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Emphasis mine.
“Hey so I know we’ve been doing a genocide but look, we’re being really nice when we bomb innocent civilians homes by letting them know we’re going to bomb their homes.”
This (a) doesn’t excuse literal genocide and (b) is just a “nicer” version of exactly the thing they’re appalled Hamas just did. You don’t get to cry foul if you’re going to retaliate with a tit for tat play.
They are terrorists. That’s literally what they are. The fact that attacked an evil fascist state’s city doesn’t change that.
Tbf, no good lawyer wants to work for him because he keeps doing a fucky wucky every five seconds.
Yes. You don’t technically have to show for civil cases though.
Me and my fiancée had the conversation the other night that it feels like if the GOP wins a supermajority, there’ll be acetal fucking blood in the streets.
Lemmy is not full of tankies, yours truly a communist.
And your post was free market romanticism.
Don’t forget that mods often don’t play nice with games off steam
Anti-capitalist ≠ tankie
In fact Communist ≠ tankie
Tankies are specifically defenders of Marxist-Leninist communism and their one party state rule (which is ironically not communism, it’s Stalinism which is a form of autocratic socialism)
No they permanently lost claim to “fighting the good fight” when they literally bundled their software with malware.
Unfortunately for him “that’s not what I meant” is a pretty terrible legal defense since we don’t need what he “meant”
If “what it sounds like to a reasonable listener” is “I did the crime, it was my decision, I’m guilty” then he’s guilty.
What he meant is irrelevant.
I don’t think there’s any members of government who are members of a church that espouses the Seven Mountain Mandate, but prettyuch the entire “Freedom Caucus” is very buddy buddy with a lot of influential people from Seven Mountain Mandate churches.
These churches also routinely are seen with celebrities such as Justin Bieber, the Kardashian, etc.
They would also tell you they’re not an apocalypse cult and they just want to “bring about the second coming”
But like, that’s an apocalypse cult. If you want to end the world, you’re an apocalypse cult.
Seven Mountain Cult is honestly terrifying if not for the simple fact of how effectively they’ve infiltrated governance and actively campaign for the end of the world.
Except for when it’s very important to Russia.
Trade is not barter. And if it involved coinage or it isn’t barter. It’s a form of market economy.
Market Economy ≠ Barter
Where did I mention the 16th or 19th centuries? And mercantilism was 100% not a barter economy. It was a form of market economy controlled by the state… so I’m pretty sure it’s you who misunderstands what mercantilism is.
The ends justify the means?
Hypotheticaly then: if I had a 100% guarantee that murdering all babies would get them into heaven, but you’d go to hell, is it morally right to murder all babies? The ends justify the means, do they not? We need to get babies to heaven! So murder them all!
No, it’s absolutely still monstrous. Because utilitarianism is stupid.