RAAAWR
More like “buck bawk” peck peck
RAAAWR
More like “buck bawk” peck peck
Spiders setting up websites for extream identity theft?
Those of us who grew up during the IRA bombing find that statement odd.
Humans do something very Elephant.
Of course, it’s a bit of a petty detail. And is equally valid both ways.
But really goes to show how humanity has got so much wrong. We again and again discover animals doing things we have classed as uniquely human.
In every way, we decide humans are unique amongst animal spices. Seems to fail if we wait long enough.
And before any vegans use this to make some argument. Your choices are yours. But I am yet to see any other animal spices shame members for the diet they evolved eating. So maybe that will be the unique way to measure humanity that lasts. Because eating meat. Or even treating it with cruelty, ain’t one. if you doubt it, look at the insects that breed inside living animals. Many imprisoning the creature as their children grow, then eat it alive.
As much as I’d rather humanity be caring. This is not your argument against meat eaters.
Pretty much.
Edit. But if we are honest. Its not like western nations are going to stop buying vote to teach them the cost.
Unfortunately I don’t drink their products as I’m cheap. So can’t really help myself. But I would be amazed if a boycott of coca cola ever happened effectively.
Lets remember the fanta story.
Coke never left Germany even when the US finally joined the 2nd World War. The traded as fanta to avoid losing sales as an American brand. Once the German people felt they had reason to distrust the US.
Remember this company has a history of refusing to take sides.
True.
At least in poverty stricken nations. Oh and the US. But most of the rest of the world is a little different.
Sure in the early days of developments wealth helps in all nations. But it just tends to be a matter of time before new medical tech makes it to all the population in most 1st world nations.
The US is really pretty unique being one of the wealthiest nations but not having universal health care.
I sorta agree.
Unfortunately modern science is slow to change ideas it has accepted in the past.
Neil Degrass Tyson did an interesting talk on the % of religion in science. Based in the US. And it basically indicated that the higher you get. The lower the odds you belie in religiose ideals.
But the levels were pretty high until the top. And still not 0 then.
I personally think (opinion not fact) this has left us with a community. That hesitates to challenge science on religion alone. IE we don’t see ideas thrown out when it is clear religion was involved in forming them. But instead only when clear evidence refutes them.
In my less the humble opinion. This leaves science with a few old wives nuns tails. That are still followed 400years after the 1689 acceptance of the scientific method.
Honestly Humanity has been pretty arrogant. Took 100s of years before we recognised birds use tools. Mainly because everytime it was seen. Some other excuse was seen for why the bird was sticking a stick into a tree. Science was so sure mankind was unique it was unwilling to see reality.
But honestly if you think that is bad. Do some research into why European explorers thought Europe represented the most advanced civilisation. African cities raised to the ground rather then face the idea they may have been their before us.
How?
Well no country is forced to obay sanctions. Such things are (like all international law) built on treaty agreements between nations.
So only nations with agreements to support sanctions against other nations are required to enforce them within there own laws.
And in russias case Those agreeing nations are mostly NATO members. Where as china was a warsaw pack member during the cold war.
It could be inherited from a common ancestor.
Or it could just have likely evolved multiple times in different primate branches.
As we have absolutely no way to document how early it first happened in our own branch. To assume it is linked is just more attempts to try and indicate the human branch is special. Use of tools has been seen in many many branches. We don’t assume that came from a joint ancestor that crawled out of the water. Or before.
Not a very valid point.
Every nation complains about its leaders. Some are still bigger shit heads then others.
Simple fact is human beings are more likely to comment on issues then note boring reliability. It still in no way effects the cross nation comparison.
The best of nations in anything has a right and even need to look for better. That is afterall how progress works.
But you need clear comparisons and data to accusse those complaints of properganda.
I huess you need to add the amount of false science to things as an excuse.
Exxon for example spent millions on climate research. And were the first to discover global warming evidence.
But after a change of leadership spent billions on false or questionable science to argue against man made and every other excuse about the evidence.
Plastics is another that did a huge amount of damage to the laymans intrepretation of science.
Plus many many more over the last 4 or 5 decades.
Hard to blame lay men for thinking science is often about the highest bidder rather then formal methods.
Your last para is likely the important one. Rather then this being some idea to make things more efficient. It was likely done purely to see how human brain cells function. This may long term lead to more effective solutions by mimicking the ideas learned. But ATM we really still do not know how much we don’t know about the human brain.
So the purification filters ate really targets to aim jewish space lasers at vacinated kids?
Not funny whe. It sounds so like R congress people.
Standard jet engines aren’t
So yes there is an alternative. But corperations have to be willing to invest. Just like consumers had to get engines upgraded when we moved to unleaded. And cars replaced when moving to ev or any other fuel.
An valid alternative dose not require everything to be identicle. Only corporate profiteering needs that.
One side will claim the other did. And respond.
We all know what way around it will be.
But will see debates about weather or not the evidence of it being broken is real.
EDIT: honestly trying to avoid takibg sides. As niether are entirly innocent.
But fuck I am getting fed up with all sides claiming any support for the other is racist.
We have to much fucking racism to allow governemts to pull it out as a properganda move\weapon of war. While ignoring the actual actions.
Actually that brings up an interesting comparison. In Victorian england it was common for gentlemen to have art of naked faeries. Because having naked human women was morally unacceptable. Whereas faeries not so much.
Makes you wonder if rural American men find remembering an alien anal probe. As more morally acceptable to their mindset. Than bob next door getting intimate with them.
well rummer has it. That is where aliens tend to congregate.
Seems they must have a very interesting biology. That they developed anal probes as there scientific data gathering device.
Or maybe they evolved on a world with only a liquid diet. So the methods of expelling solid food waste is the most surprising to them.
Or you know maybe lots of red neck folks. Trying to explain to their wives how objects keep getting stuck.
Given all it wants to do is life up and down.
If we make tbe huge assumption it has any idea what is happening.
Your wife is likely its actual intent.