i hope you are right but I’m growing pessimistic about this and believe it is just another smoke screen

Genocide committed by Israel is in full swing, so, like Joe Biden said (allegedly) to Netanyahu : stop your bullshit.

Two million Palestinians would vomit on your post if they had something to eat. (thanks @oakey66)

Mass adoption ? No, they “Mass to don’t”.

Yes … and it doesn’t know when it is on time.
Also, machines are getting better and they can help us with inspiration.

i agree with you in that, in my opinion, America and the West should not support the genocide committed against Palestine. Also, they should not engage in wars to grab petroleum resources. Disclaimer : i’ve never been (surprise!) and American president.

translation of major allegation :
“The (French) Justice system considers that the lack of moderation, cooperation with law enforcement, and the tools offered by Telegram (disposable numbers, cryptocurrencies, etc.) make it an accomplice to drug trafficking, pedocriminal offenses, and scams.”

TF1 (… standing for Télévision Française 1) is a French commercial television network … TF1’s average market share of 24% makes it the most popular (french) domestic network.

This garbage cannot be identified, thanks MBFC !

Kamala would still be great like now but on the other side it sure would improve things if they had a candidate which was not a rapist, felon and worse.

i was going to upvote but then I read FuglyDuck’s answer here.

No I was not sarcastic. So now i am trying to read your paper and i think that it is above my knowledge level.

As a layman i had the intuition that instead of having two accounts as i proposed for voting and commenting which was implemented by @rimu, we might have had something like blockchain or filecoin or some coin that would represent voting power and that would be based on our commenting value… so that coin would have been an intermediary to make voting anonymous.

Finally i know enough about science that i know that i don’t know much.

Edit : after a rapid overview of the article i would say that this method :
“Blind Signature-Based e-Voting”
would be most appropriate to our social media voting and i noticed the work they have done is more targeting national elections where the outcome is much more important.

Yes but … Navigation icon at the top right of the pages leads to these :
https://join.piefed.social/docs/piefed-mobile/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/developers/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/admin-guide/ https://join.piefed.social/docs/installation/
https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/

@rimu@piefed.social did great on my simple idea and this is very nice to know. He did not implement his other idea of having a pool of available robots that would vote one time each for each one vote of each one user(s) … also I thought it might be implemented in the frontend but he did implement it in the backend.

i did not say before but i was also thinking about complex mechanisms involving some kind of coin that would represent voting power that could be spent when voting or accumulated maybe with some loss of value with time … but then i read about the many research paper that were published about such things … in conclusion i believe we will see many other iterations of such social media.

thanks for the feedback 😌

Thanks @souperk@reddthat.com,
i believe many users will be interested in these papers about cryptographically secure voting.

Amongst them there would be :
@rimu@piefed.social
@SorteKanin@feddit.dk
@brbposting@sh.itjust.works

User’s votes anonymization through this system looks quite nice for me.

Let’s create separate accounts for voting and for posting so to improve anonymity and freedom of expression.

Well, this would increase birthrates ! /joke

if it “ran straight”, it wouldn’t have tangential speed, only radial.

it would be absolutely immensely catastrophic from the point of view of the planet … but for us and for the Sun, it would be nothing.