• ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh bravo, you miserable dingus.

    What does this mean for the fediverse? I presume because it’s split up into a million loosely connected pieces, we should be largely insulated from corporate invasion and interference. You can’t get us ALL, motherfuckers!

    • JBloodthorn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Meta joins, and makes it super easy to onramp from instabook
      Meta slowly starts not following the protocol, forcing the protocol to adapt since they have 90%+ of the users
      Eventually, Meta decides to abandon the protocol, and from the perspective of their users, we just went offline
      Same playbook Google used (XMPP).

        • The problem is human nature. Content, activity and funding for development will drop off very hard and it’ll likely become like XMPP is today, aka bloated, a mess of standards and basically forgotten about.

          Meta just want to suck all they can out of a promising technology and it isn’t their first trip at the rodeo. See Occulus as well. People are right to want to keep Meta at arms length.

          • u_tamtam@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t spread FUD about XMPP, please 🙂. It works wonder, it’s in fact everything I’ve ever wanted for personal/family chats and large IRC-like chatrooms. It also happens to be one of the easiest things I ever had to self-host thanks to how wonderful and batteries included ejabberd is. I have developed several clients and bots/intefrations in several languages thanks to how versatile it is.

            Fun fact, it has a PubSub component which is (IMO) technically superior to the fediverse more lightweight and more flexible.

            If one thing, the great XMPP rediscovery is overdue if you ask me 😉