It struck me watching Christopher Nolan’s masterful three-hour epic telling of the story of J. Robert Oppenheimer, long labeled the Father of the Atomic Bomb, that this is a period piece with…

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stupid question.

    Is the movie actually understandable without subtitles?

    The plot and story for Tenet was right up my alley, but my inability to understand the dialog frustrated the crap out of me - and I have a pretty solid home audio setup.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s perfectly understandable from an audio perspective, what makes it hard to follow is continually jumping around in time frames.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i’m planning on getting a caption reciever thing - hopefully they aren’t all rented out

      shit, will there be a line?

    • miles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      After having seen it, there are some scenes where it is difficult to follow the dialog which I’m sure is intentional. I haven’t seen Tenet but I think Oppenheimer is not as bad in this regard, in part because there’s less exposition – this is all based on real events in the real world and there aren’t a lot of mechanics to have to explain, and also because the story isn’t as plot-driven as many of Nolan’s thrillers. No MacGuffins, no car chases, shootouts or real twists; it’s more about the man, his relationships and how his career plays out. That said, for example there is a scene where he’s talking to his wife outdoors, it’s windy and they’re not facing camera and the fact that I couldn’t follow what they were saying did take me out… instead of being engaged in the conversation I was more aware I was sitting there watching Chris Nolan dialogue, waiting for it to be over.